TERM PAPER
Write a report on the interview you have conducted
COURSE TITLE :
WORKSHOP ADMINISTRATION
COURSE CODE:PAD 412
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PRESENTED BY
SUBMITTED TO:
COURSE LECTURER
Name of school
Date
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction of Report writing
1.2 Interview
1.3 Problems of interviews process
1.4 Report on the he role of women in rural development
1.5 Recommendations
1.6 Conclusion/ Summary
1.7 Reference
1.0 Introduction of Report writing: The following are
format,rules to be followed for a better report writing:
·
Title Section – This includes the name of the author(s) and
the date of report preparation.
·
Summary – There needs to be a summary of the major points,
conclusions, and recommendations. It needs to be short as it is a general
overview of the report. Some people will read the summary and only skim the
report, so make sure you include all the relevant information. It would be best
to write this last so you will include everything, even the points that might
be added at the last minute.
·
Introduction – The first page of the report needs to have an
introduction. You will explain the problem and show the reader why the
report is being made. You need to give a definition of terms if you did not
include these in the title section, and explain how the details of the report
are arranged.
·
Body – This is the main section of the report.
There needs to be several sections, with each having a subtitle.
Information is usually arranged in order of importance with the most important
information coming first.
·
Conclusion – This is where everything comes together. Keep
this section free of jargon as most people will read the Summary and
Conclusion.
·
Recommendations – This is what needs to be done. In plain
English, explain your recommendations, putting them in order of priority.
·
Appendices – This includes information that the experts in
the field will read. It has all the technical details that support your conclusions.
Remember that the information needs to be organized
logically with the most important information coming first.
1.2 Interview
Here is a
step-by-step guide to help you write the best possible interview article:
1.
Come up with a list of good questions. Before you
can begin writing your interview essay or feature article, you’ll need to
conduct the actual interview. You should do plenty of research and compile a
list of questions for your interview subject. Read other good interviews,
profiles, or write-ups on the person you’re interviewing to get a sense of the
types of questions they’re normally asked. Then, do your best to brainstorm
specific questions that you feel the subject has never answered before.
Ideally, a question should provoke a unique, thoughtful response. When writing
interview questions, also try to think of open-ended questions that will make
your interviewee speak at length on a subject.
2.
Interview your subject. When you
finally sit down with your interview subject, make sure the interviewee is
comfortable and both parties are aware of any time constraints there might be.
It’s essential to have a recording device during the interview process. If you
are a person who prefers to take notes while interviewing, make sure that your note-taking
isn’t distracting or off-putting to your subject. You don’t want to spend the
entire interview with your eyes buried in your notes.
3.
Transcribe your interview. After you’ve
completed your interview, transcribe the recording of the entire exchange.
There are transcribing services that can do this for you, but transcribing your
own interview can be valuable for your writing process. Typing out the exact
text of your questions and answers can give you an initial sense of which parts
of the interview are the most compelling. This process can also illuminate
which sections are dull or lacking, which can help you determine if you’ll need
to ask any clarifying follow-up questions.
4.
Determine your article’s format. Interview
writing can take many forms. That form might be determined in advance by your
editor, or you may be left to choose your own based on your specific writing
style, point of view, and set of writing skills. Some people prefer to write a
standard question and answer type of article, in which the body of your essay
is simply the text of your questions and your subject’s answers. Others prefer
a narrative format, in which the main points of your subject’s answers are
described in the third person. Certain writers prefer a hybrid of the narrative
and Q&A format. Regardless of your article or essay format, you should make
sure that the beginning of your piece is particularly strong so that your
reader is immediately engaged. That may mean reordering your interview so that
the most compelling answer comes first.
5.
Rephrase and polish. Once you’ve
determined the basic structure of your interview paper, it’s time to clean it
up. The raw text of your interview is likely littered with half-thoughts,
tangents, and stall words like “um” or “well.” In order to make your interview
cogent and readable, you’ll likely need edit to remove stall words. You may
also rephrase many of the direct quotes. Paraphrasing or rephrasing exact
quotes in order to make them more coherent is fine, as long as you are not
changing the message behind the quotes; if you do paraphrase, do not include
quotation marks around the paraphrased material.
6.
Review and proofread. Proofreading
is one of the final steps of writing an interview article. Compare your
paraphrased answers to the transcript to make sure you have not altered your
subject’s meaning. Check to make sure the names of people or places referenced
by your subject are spelled correctly. This is also the time to review your
article on a macro level. Are there any sections of the interview that feel
redundant or superfluous? If so, cut those sections and move on to your next
question. If you have any spare time, try to select images or particularly
absorbing pull quotes that can accompany your article.
1.3 Problems of interviews process
Here are five common problems that can
play havoc with your interview process, and how to avoid them.
1.
Asking the wrong questions
Job interviews can often follow a
formulaic approach which means that candidates often face the same questions.
This is especially true with experienced recruiters, who often feel confident
enough in their interview skills to simply wing the interview, and consequently
use the same tried and tested questions time and again.
This is not the right approach.
Every interview should be tailored to
the position and a series of questions that relate specifically to that
position should be drawn up in advance. Additional aptitude or psychometric
tests can also form part of the process should the role require them, and they
in turn might give you new areas to question.
But a specific set of tailored questions
is a minimum requirement.
I appreciate that tailoring the
interview in advance requires additional work but you really will reap the
benefits if you take the time to do it.
Something else to consider if your HR
team are conducting the first round of interviews and the position requires a
particularly technical skillset. If this is the case for you, it may be worth
having the Hiring Manager present at the first interview to ensure that not
only are the correct questions being asked but also that the answers are being
interpreted correctly.
2.
Inconsistency between candidates
Without a solid structure to the
interview, and even with one, it’s very easy to be inconsistent with your
approach between different candidates.
Different days, different time of day,
or the fact that you had an argument with your spouse before you left the house
this morning. Any number of other factors can affect the interview and the
outcome.
Even different interview rooms can make a
difference to the candidate and your impression of them.
Consistency is key to a solid interview
process and your ability to weigh candidates against one another. Without it,
you may as well pick a suitably qualified prospect randomly.
So even at the expense of additional
information, keep the interview process constant.
This sounds easier than you may think in
practice, but there are measures you can put in place to help with consistency.
3.
Bias
It’s human nature for any interviewer to
allow. The best way to go about reducing that bias it to use some predetermined
questions or a scoring system.
People are generally hard-wired to seek
out common traits and interests in others. Obviously that means that the
recruitment process can, if left unchecked, turn the office into a social club
in the making.
This is especially true in an interview
situation – you’ll naturally gravitate to people you like without making a
qualitative assessment of whether they can do the job or not.
Few managers would accept this theory,
but the proof is indisputable. We naturally seek out others like us. And while
any hiring manager will do their best to remain objective, people have a
natural aversion to others that are too different.
That can easily turn a minor negative on
a CV into a total deal breaker. Although a similar person with more common
ground will skate through despite some potential glaring holes in their skills
and abilities.
4.
Interview fatigue
Interview fatigue is a very real problem
and something you need to be aware of when you’re considering being consistent
with your interview approach.
For example: Imagine you’ve set aside a whole day for interviewing
candidates, which is often the only way to deal with each appointment
logistically.
Can you honestly say that the last
candidate gets the same level of attention as the first?
That potentially means that a
candidate’s chances and your company’s future could literally depend on the
luck of the draw. Eventually, that has to
go against you.
When people listen to broadly similar
answers many times in a day, it’s only natural to switch off at some point and
stop listening.
So if you’re in charge of the interview
process then schedule regular breaks and, if possible, limit the number of
interviews in one day to no
more than three.
Interview fatigue applies to candidates,
too.
So unless physical and mental endurance
are actually part of the test then try to avoid full days of evaluation. The
emotional stress will start to affect your results.
5.
Interviews are inherently dishonest
A candidate is there to prove themselves
to you, the sole goal for the day is to secure the job. Considering what is at
stake, it’s reasonable to expect candidates to lie and others to be
crippled by nerves.
So unless you’re well-versed
in spotting the signs then you can find yourself employing the best
politician, rather than the best person for the job.
This can obviously be a huge problem for
any interview process, and one that any company needs to immediately resolve.
Of course seeing through the veneer that
well-practiced candidates manage to present, and the cloud of nerves that
affects the less experienced, is just one of the skills of a top hiring
manager.
1.4
Report on the he role of women in rural development
The
research reveals that there local and international policies, regulations that
support women participation and involvement in development activities of the
rural areas development.
Some
women during the process of interviews and a made available by the secretary
sources of data reveal that they are not allowed free hand to get involved in
their rural area development activities.
International
organization like UN fully support women and girls protect and having equal
rights, equal opportunities for the female genders.
Hence,
from the interview we can conclude that all nations that needs speedy
development in rural and urban centers should involve women.
1.5
Recommendations
Following the trends and happenings around
the political , economic environment and development in rural areas in Nigeria,
it is becomingclearer that women may never achieve the mandated 30% affirmation
as enshrined in the Beijing plan of action except the following recommendations
are adhered to:
1. Women,girls should be given equal
opportunities to contribute to the development activities of the rural areas.
2. Women in rural areas should be encouraged
by Government as well as individuals to engage in agriculture for massive food
production in rural areas. This is part of development
3. Political parties should create a support
network for prospective aspirant by pairing them with
established women politicians who will be
playing key role as mentors and provide capacity
building for young or aspiring female
politicians as to enhance and develop them ahead of
subsequent elections.
4. Building mass Coalition of women support and
advocacy group using NGOs and
Grassroots women associations to coordinate
support and advocacy for fellow women aspirants
5. To create enabling environment that
allows women to engage meaningfully in decision
making process in a sustainable and
effective way that is free from violence and harassments of
any kind.
6. Establishment of legal funds to assist
women politicians to challenge electoral
malpractices
of any form at all levels of political processes.
Summary/ Conclusion
It’s often said that the interview is
the gateway to finding out facts about a research topic. Both oral and written
interviews. Using written interview method were the written questions are sent
in hard copy, demanding filling and returning same. The response may not feel
comfortable to give a sincere answers to some of the questions.
As such true facts may not be organized
from some research work
Getting the interview process right is
essential for the long term future of any organization.
You want the very best people for your
organisation, so take the time to audit your interview processes and get them
right.
It really is worth it!
REFERENCES
Web sources:
https://www.careeranna.com/articles/report-writing-format-sample-report/
https://responsewebrecruitment.co.uk/online-recruitment-blog/problems-with-your-interview-process/
UN Women
Mark Wilkinson 2020: Problems of interviews
Agbalajobi, D.T. (2009). Women’s
participation and the political process in Nigeria: Problems
and prospects. A publication of African
Journal of Political Science and International
Relations Vol. 4(2), pp. 075-082, February
2010
Daniel, E.G. & Faith, O.O. (2013). Women
in Governance and Sustainable Democracy in
Nigeria, 1999-2012, Economics & Sociology,
Vol. 6(1), 89-107.
Kolawole, O.T., Adeigbe, K., Adebayo, A.A.,
& Abubakar M.B. (2013). Women participation
in the political process in Nigeria.
Centrepoint Journal (Humanities Edition), 2(15).
Mohammed A. & Zaid B.A., (2014). Women
and political participation: Toward attainment of
35% affirmative action and obstacles to the
women participation in Nigerian politics and
decision making process. Journal of Research
in Humanities and Social Science, 2(9),
65-71.
National Bureau of Statistics, (2010).
Report of the National Literacy Survey.
Ngara, C.O. & Ayabam, A.T. (2013) “Women
in politics and decision making in Nigeria:
Challenges and Prospects. Journal of
Business and Social Sciences, 2(8), 47-58.
Nigeria
Centenary Country Report on Women (2013). Hundred years of the Nigerian woman:
0 Comments